--0000000000007e6c0606309d9de7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mansi, This works for our location. Per our updated policy we ask for three references but as long as we get one response we can move them forward. We do not have to have three so hopefully that won't cause a significant delay. Will a copy of the references be provided to us? Thank you all for your help with this! On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 3:40=E2=80=AFPM Mansi Mehta wro= te: > Hi Teresa, > > Thank you for your patience. I wanted to share the reference check proces= s > we use in the Northeast. Please let me know if this approach will work fo= r > your team in Kansas City: > > > - *Background Report Review:* Our CG Onboarding Specialists review > each candidate's background report. > - *Completed Reference Checks: *If the report shows that all reference > contacts have been successfully reached and information provided, our > current process remains unchanged, and the Onboarding Specialist moves= the > candidate forward. > - *Incomplete Reference Checks:* If the reference checks are > incomplete (i.e., not all contacts have been reached), the Onboarding > Specialist will not move the candidate forward until all contacts have= been > successfully reached. They will document each attempt using this Refer= ence > Check Form > > and will only advance the candidate once the reference checks are comp= leted. > > > I would like to recognize that this may introduce delays in moving > candidates through the hiring process. However, we understand that > completing these reference checks is a necessary pre-hire requirement to > meet state regulations. > > Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to explore a > different process. > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 7:00=E2=80=AFAM Emily Russell > wrote: > >> Yes, absolutely. >> >> Teresa - we take ownership of getting references completed if Accurate >> does not get them completed. I=E2=80=99ll let Mansi, CC=E2=80=99d here, = give you the >> specifics. :-) >> >> >> *Emily Russell* >> SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 8:54=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> Hi Emily, >>> >>> Would you, or a member of your team be available to meet with Teresa, >>> our GM in Kansas City, to review the onboarding process? >>> >>> We need a better solution here. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Tim >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Teresa Heit >>> Date: Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 9:11=E2=80=AFAM >>> Subject: Onboarding Process >>> To: Timothy Thomas >>> >>> >>> Tim, >>> >>> Per our state regulations we need to have reference checks completed on >>> job candidates prior to hire. The reference checks are done through th= e >>> background checks where they make 3 attempts to contact them and if the= y >>> don't get a response they close them out. >>> >>> I reached out to HR and Natalie had said that the recruiter would have >>> to stress the importance of the candidates