--0000000000000547de06141e755e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Cheryl! You're right, we already avoid those keywords. We'll keep an eye on things. Thank you for the collaboration. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:27=E2=80=AFAM Cheryl Cartwright wrote: > Hi Alexa, > > The spreadsheet doesn't have the postal codes but looking up a few of the > unqualified leads they don't appear to be in one area and definitely the > areas I saw I would keep. Many times clients tell us we are out to lunch > with our prices but that doesn't mean they can't actually afford them. > > Not interested in our services usually relates to these main things: > -Foot care ( a ton of calls about this as it's on Maven Cares site) This > really needs to be removed. > -Medical equipment or supplies > -Free (government funded) home care. This doesn't always mean personal > support worker care but can mean Physio or Occupational Therapy > -Retirement home > > Not sure if this is helpful but I suspect we don't use those adwords > anyway. > > Cheryl > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:49=E2=80=AFPM Alexa Graziani > wrote: > >> Hi Cheryl, >> >> Two questions stemming from the doc: >> >> 1) For those listed as financially unqualified - do you think the postal >> code they were from would tend to drive unqualified leads (therefore >> should get excluded)? >> 2) For those "not looking for our services" - can you outline the >> services they were looking for so I can exclude any keywords along those >> themes? >> >> Thank you, >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:43=E2=80=AFPM Alexa Graziani >> wrote: >> >>> Awesome, thank you so much! For those that were financially unqualified= , >>> would you say that they were located in a postal code you'd assume woul= d >>> mostly be financially unqualified or do you think the area would also h= ave >>> financially qualified leads (if you were to get more calls/forms from >>> there)? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:10=E2=80=AFPM Cheryl Cartwright >> ccartwright@thekey.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This is now complete. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 5:19=E2=80=AFPM Alexa Graziani >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you so much! >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:02=E2=80=AFPM Cheryl Cartwright >>>> ccartwright@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Alexa, >>>>>> >>>>>> I=E2=80=99m so sorry. Yes of course, me look and get to work on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will have it by tomorrow, Monday latest. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks again, >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheryl >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:44=E2=80=AFPM Alexa Graziani >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Cheryl, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Following up here - we have decided to move the Waterloo budget to >>>>>>> Toronto. The reasoning for this is: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. The Waterloo team isn't staffed to handle in person >>>>>>> assessments while Toronto is >>>>>>> 2. While we were seeing SOC, overall, the type of client you'd >>>>>>> like to get generally lives in the Toronto area vs Water